You can be security conscious and still get hacked ! I was way back in the day. I can help you and give you some tips to move you forwards in getting back to a healthy website.

You might like me have struggled to understand what Browserify is even looking at their initial explanation for what it does. The reason being is that the assume you know what these [modules, require] things are :

"Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies."

I think as a developer you might be at any point along your climb that will never end in a summit. Thus you are not rubbish because you don't understand something nor does that make you a designer.

I had taken a look at node a couple of years ago now it feels and took it to be really different and I didn't get what browserify was trying to do and where should I use it.

This post is about a user case scenario that may not be worth it to you ? Making a wordpress theme that has js of course and that browserify manages.
Normally in a wordpress theme you will add js with something like this :

wp_enqueue_script( 'material-jquery', get_template_directory_uri() . '/js/jq.js', array(), '1.0', false ); 

This pops a script tag in your theme and loads like normal. So there is nothing wrong with this for a theme. The issue comes if you have a lot of javascript to add on top of the framework js and maybe jquery...so you start to get quite a few tags and each one results in a network call. So reducing the amount of these is good. Browserify does that as a side effect. Browserify bundles up your js into a single file.

You might have some utility functions that you always use and here is a cut down example of something that would be 'module' of javascript...

utils.js

"use strict"

module.exports = {
      isLive:()=>{
        if(window.location.href.indexOf('localhost')>0) {
          //console.log("localhost")
          return false;
        }else{
          //console.log("live")
          return true;
        }
      },
      hideAll:()=>{
        var sItems = "#platform, #cause, #news";
        $(sItems).hide()
      },
      testF:()=>{
        return "it works! es 6 arrow function yay!"
      }
    } 

​Notice also that this uses es6 or es2015..thats another useful addition. So think of browserify as being able to bundle your javascrpt together but via plugins you can make the es6 into es5 javascript that will be supported in browsers. the above code can be used and accessed with require. Notice above the module.exports  this exposes what you decide to expose in your file or module. To access a module use this ...

var utils = require("./utils") 

So you have an entry file that you point browserify to make sure to include your files and modules then you save a lot of network requests and you are able to get the plugins for browserify working for you. I prefer to use browserify with gulp.

I hope this article gets you started with a few new code bases or toolsets as the official site was written for those at a particular level.​

I just had to share this wonder that is the Boxworth Library. 

Boxworth Map

What is a Product Manager ?

A Product Manager (PM) has to have an all round entrepreneurial skill set. The PM will be expected to deliver according to a broader concept. As an example an App would start out with a clear interface to solve the idea of course but the development and roadmap are developed after. There are clear examples of good ideas getting to market first that did not succeed instead a better UX and Marketing won consider My Space Vs Facebook. The expectations of the user are severe and poor UX is not an option if you want the product to succeed. Having good ideas after the initial idea is not elementary and it amazes me how little value is placed in the recruitment process in an individual that is an idea generator or inventor.

A couple of videos here of me coding live on my react app. I am refactoring out static data into a static file that simulates an API call for now. But the latency did cause issues as you can see requiring a cycle through FLUX pattern to fix.

On Angular (nG) 1

I like Angular 1 because it asked us developers what we wanted and it gave us most everything we need OOTB. It works well. Granted ng1 doesn't have the shadow dom of REACT but this is where Angular 2 will come in and Type Script as a way to solve js standardisation.

On React

So I am building my own first react app. A small tour selector gizmo that has a filter function and goes to a detail page. I am using flux as the pattern with Flux.Dispatch and MicroEvent (this I don't think is great why not use a single lib for it ie a better Dispatch class.) to keep things tiny…I don't even have a lib to make any asncyhronous calls yet (next job making asynchronous calls) I will see how far I can get natively with javascript and es6 Promise before adding a dependency. Yes I am getting up to speed with some of the newer es6 stuff.
I really get the component nature and I like that I build my own ship of dependencies…I love JSX now but REACT I feel it misses a few key things to get started faster but of course that should not make the tech stack choice decision criteria. Routing etc can be easy to roll your own…

On Angular 2

(excuse my ignorance..) Promises to be all the best performance of React but with the awesome OOTB we liked from ng1? – I don't care if I need to learn angular expressions they are not hard -I cant even remember js OTTOMH and always need the net as an aide memoir..map for example is new es6 anyway…arrow notation etc..

Javascript standards and ECMA Script

(Es6 = es2015) being able to write these new language features and compile to es5 (what todays browsers are compatible with) means that it will just work in decent browsers…so that means babel or typescript and this is where we see why we don't write in javascript anymore..we are transpiling it ! Yes not enough frikin keywords already !
Beyond I think we need to start to look at language agnostic ability to code so anyone can build something…speak and code for example you would simply speak 'give me a user login form – add a password reminder link' etc..

On Testing TDD 

Sounding like something you might pick up in the 80's (TDD) ..I don't care about testing functions as much as I care about real user testing..(sorry I find it inefficient but I am happy to write unit tests I would rather be learning stuff of greater importance). Unit tests don't catch the bigger bugs real testing does on the final platform. OK they help you limit regressions if you don't code well to start with.

On Architecture

I get MVC mostly but get confused with complexity of many peoples implementations online the fix is stop reading stuff online and stick to what I know. Mostly I get that I want my functions to do just one thing and my views to just be dumb views as much as possible…mostly I get annoyed when frameworks don't allow good communication between controllers or I need to pass stuff around…trying to debug a chain of events is horrible. So far React doesn't look too bad. Don't forget I have been round and round the same arguments for 15+ years…

On Builds

I love my builds and get stressed when for example a scss change doesn't immediately spark a build behind the scenes and a browser refresh this is the development motorway and is worth getting right. Use gulp as a pref. It does all I need to do and webpack looks like a popular thing to explore but I haven't seen anyone who is capable of showing me yet how its better than gulp. Grunt seems good and capable but needs more lines of code to achieve the same.

My History of Coding

I have been around a long time (since 98) to recognise various patterns in my industry. Frameworks libs etc..some skills need to be rated higher like js and knowing how to solve a business problem in code…it's a step beyond the frameworks and even knowing js isn't enough. Yet recruiters are employing on the keywords like angular…it's not their fault. Younger developers also don't realise that in the real world things work differently TDD testing etc… no matter how talented with the code they may (showing great promise) be they need to appreciate the business side and human side more IMO. One bug bear is the developers need to complicate things to show other developers he/she is better ! Coders think they are the smartest so I ask them if they can solve Africa or peace the Middle East. Please get me – I will find you more welcoming and smarter if you can explain what are quite simple concepts generally than if you minimise and obfuscate your code to be clever. Pseudo code it out if need be…stop looking for validation. You are already clever you know it be satisfied with that.

The rest is my code history and why I am here and somewhat if I may brag of my own unique position (we all have that !).

Let's start with flash and as2 javascript syntax but very procedural but introduced a very creative way to solve visual problems in code.
This moved onto as3 which introduced types interfaces and was immediately very different. OO style javascript but compiled and run in the flash player.
During this time I got exposure to php and CMS in the background so I have this old school web1 experience. As3 did bring along pure MVC frameworks and thus my adventure of frameworks started. I have seen many come and go. Also libs.
The DOM was new however and brought its own learning curve. Now it's a shadow DOM..

From this I moved into javascript development when flash was taken away from mobile phones which was quite a shame really – their video formats and playback was amazing…I decided not to live with a dead politically speaking technology. Browser issues and versions brought various polyfills enabling functionality in older browsers but it was very clunky and felt inefficient. ECMA Script was a challenging standard js didn't always follow..Again now es6 and the next es7 but JQuery was a way in which web 1 looked web 2 and we loved that library as it saved time…but oh boy there was the wild west of architecture..I seen javascript in html inside Java database fields in the CMS being rendered to pages…!!! Young developers beware.

Fast forward to today

Typescript is very close to as3 introducing interfaces and strongly typed variables. Javascript isn't strongly typed so we have typescript compiler warning us about these types in compilation. JSX or plain raw react using es6 is also very good in that both allow us to use the new tools like map and run them through babel or typescript and get es5 valid js.

And this is where I am at today…the joys of react and asynchronous loading await me this afternoon..

I have been busy building up quality content and building relationships for tours and car rental for http://bestantigua.com which now has its own website and we run that alongside the blog http://bestantigua.wordpress.com

Part of the development work is a web / mobile app for booking cars in Antigua. You can have a play here http://bestantigua.com/app/app.html#/cars

I am now shifting focus onto REACT from the facebook developers and Angular 2. The preference is perhaps for Angular 2 not because I know Angular 1 but because I like frameworks and the support for applications that brings.
Both are compiling less than familiar 'JS' into .js. es6 does bring less familiar js anyway and browser support is less than clear and so this step may be a necessary evil anyway.

Angular 2 uses TypeScript which seems to be transpiling very basic typescript to javascript in 4s from my terminal using 

require('gulp-typescript');

that's not that fast unfortunately thats every edit !

I am finding REACT has a steeper curve in that it is a library and requires auxiliary libs and compilers like Babel which understands JSX thats the key component language. But interestingly they both use a mock DOM concept and update the real DOM only when necessary for performance.

This is a key to fast js apps. If you must do a slow thing (update the real DOM) then do it ONCE only.

REACT JSX BABEL GULP CONFIGURATION EXAMPLE

​I was editing some aerial video and had an annoying piece of extraneous 'drone legs' and in this case the solution is to crop it out. Don't forget to resize your final movie as you need it as of course the crop will change what you start with slightly. At 4k you shouldn't loose quality but it may well increase rendering time. As I was writing this I though I would extend the article to tell you a decent beginner strategy for editing your videos for good viewing.
Also you want to do a pre render any crops as you don't want to crop the whole movie just the segment you are interested in. So for the plan start cutting out the interesting parts of your flight. If you resize the cropped segment to the same as the overall destination size this will be for the best.
Here is an example of cropping the segment.